Help PCC counselors start with the student’s plan already organized.

Students confirm coursework, destination, and major before the conversation. DegreeLume prepares the cited plan and review questions; PCC counselors keep exceptions, policy, and official decisions.

Time saved must be measured. These use cases are working product flows, not a savings claim for PCC.

  1. Before the appointment

    Arrive with the student’s planning context assembled

    The student confirms the college, destination, major, and completed or in-progress courses. DegreeLume organizes those inputs into a source-linked planning view.

    Prepares course reconstruction and the first requirement check.

  2. During the appointment

    Begin with exceptions and decisions—not a blank page

    Requirement results open to their catalog or ASSIST source, while incomplete evidence and unknowns stay visible as questions for the counselor.

    Keeps the conversation focused on judgment, tradeoffs, and next actions.

  3. Between appointments

    Let the plan carry context forward

    Students can return to the plan, update coursework, and re-run it when their major or destination changes instead of starting over from memory.

    Preserves the planning context for the next conversation.

  4. Across a caseload

    See who needs human attention first

    The public advisor demo uses fictional students to show needs-action, watch, and on-track groupings alongside next actions and appointment notes.

    Supports triage and preparation; counselors retain outreach decisions.

Illustrative workflow · no student record

PCC → UCLA · Computer Science

This example shows how responsibility is divided. It does not recommend this destination or major to any student.

Student supplies

  • College, destination, and major
  • Completed and in-progress courses
  • Changes since the last review

DegreeLume prepares

  • Source-linked requirement checks
  • Visible unknowns and review questions
  • A term-by-term planning view

Counselor decides

  • Exceptions and policy interpretation
  • Student-specific tradeoffs
  • The official education plan

Then inspect the evidence behind that workflow.

This page reads the same governed campus modules used by the planner. Counts update with the source snapshot; course rows are not copied into marketing prose.

581
course rows in the 2025–26 and 2026–27 planning closure
345
course rows carrying one or more Cal-GETC area tags
21
rows in the PCC → UCLA · Computer Science example agreement

Official sources · dated course evidence

Course applicability depends on the student’s college, coursework dates, destination, and major. Use the linked PCC catalog, GE sheets, and ASSIST agreement to review the applicable requirements and any unresolved questions.

Inspect the campus snapshot

Search the 2025–26 and 2026–27 planning closure by the course code or title PCC publishes.

2025–26 and 2026–27 source snapshot · applicability follows the course and agreement dates

6 PCC course rows shown for CS.

  • CS 001

    INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTERS AND PROGRAMMING

    3 units
  • CS 002

    FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE I

    4 units
  • CS 003A

    FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE II (C++)

    3 units
  • CS 003AL

    FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE II (C++) LAB

    1 unit
  • CS 003B

    FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (JAVA)

    3 units
  • CS 003BL

    FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (JAVA) LAB

    1 unit

Live view of DegreeLume’s 2025–26 and 2026–27 source snapshot. A displayed row is evidence of coverage, not a promise that the course applies to every student or destination.

Follow one articulation example from source to screen.

The receiving requirement labels and sending-course options below come directly from the versioned 2025-2026 ASSIST snapshot. Course titles and units resolve from PCC’s campus catalog module.

Open this ASSIST source

Receiving requirement · PCC → UCLA · Computer Science

PCC course option

  1. Introduction to Computer Science I (COM SCI 31) — part 1 of 2 (complete all)

    • CS 003AFUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE II (C++)(3 units)
  2. Introduction to Computer Science I (COM SCI 31) — part 2 of 2 (complete all)

    • CS 003ALFUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE II (C++) LAB(1 unit)
  3. Introduction to Computer Science II (COM SCI 32) — part 1 of 2 (complete all)

    • CS 008FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE III (C++) WITH DATA STRUCTURES(3 units)
  4. Introduction to Computer Science II (COM SCI 32) — part 2 of 2 (complete all)

    • CS 008LFUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE III (C++) with DATA STRUCTURES LAB(1 unit)

Example only—not a recommendation for a student who has not supplied a destination, major, and coursework.

Agreement: 2025-2026 · source questions need clarification

Review the work that requires campus expertise.

DegreeLume can expose its source trail. It cannot replace the institutional knowledge needed to decide whether that trail is complete, correctly interpreted, and useful in practice.

  1. Check the campus catalog rows

    Confirm sampled PCC codes, titles, units, renumbering, and Cal-GETC area treatment against the edition the college considers authoritative.

  2. Check the articulation interpretation

    Review sampled ASSIST rows, including complete-all sequences, alternatives, unarticulated receiving courses, and anything the engine leaves for counselor review.

  3. Check the advisor workflow

    Decide whether the source-linked view surfaces useful exceptions and questions without encroaching on counselor authority or official education plans.

Decide whether these counselor use cases are worth evaluating.

Review the working advisor flow, validate the source snapshot, and choose which—if any—workflow questions matter to PCC. This public review does not request PCC’s student records.

Evaluation format, scope, participants, timeline, and data approach remain the college’s decision.

Campus review contact

Questions about official transfer requirements should stay with PCC Transfer Center.